From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxRgB-0005Bb-Be for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:11:55 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxRd1-0002Bd-6Z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:08:39 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:08:39 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:08:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:08:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1270135981.4993.128.camel@rex> <1270154092.6277.132.camel@trini-m4400> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100318 Shredder/3.0.5pre In-Reply-To: <1270154092.6277.132.camel@trini-m4400> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Request for branch merge X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:11:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01-04-10 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:03 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> >>>> I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one >>>> but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch >>>> directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or >>>> another. >>> >>> I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem >>> and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll >>> deal with the fallout together if needed. >> >> >> I agree with Koen on this, it's a definite improvement. Let's get it merged >> and deal with any fallout from there. > > Generally yes, and just a few things to hash out over the weekend I > think. I'm going to steal Chris' thunder a bit, but during the TSC meeting we agreed that "after the weekend" would be a better time to merge it than "now". Dealing with the fallout required lots of attention, which boils down to "office hours" for most of the involved. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLtQtIMkyGM64RGpERAlNGAJsGhBaNRG6MrYu9b22xQ/u2gHixEQCgqfbK yFuD52fo3laqE1HJU/qpktI= =ShXS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----