From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzoVE-0005q5-3p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:58:50 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzoRz-0006wd-Ay for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:55:03 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:55:03 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:55:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100403171724.b9df4c84.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <201004032017.10514.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <20100406115837.fde46160.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <20100408112243.f558a240.ospite@studenti.unina.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100329 Shredder/3.0.5pre In-Reply-To: <20100408112243.f558a240.ospite@studenti.unina.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0 fails in do_configure. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:58:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08-04-10 11:22, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:58:37 +0200 > Antonio Ospite wrote: > >> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:17:09 +0200 >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> >>> Dnia sobota, 3 kwietnia 2010 o 17:17:24 Antonio Ospite napisał(a): >>>> when building gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0 (actually bitbaking >>>> fso-console-image DISTRO=minimal MACHINE=a780) I get this message: >>>> >>>> Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.23.6' but version of GLib is 2.22.1 >>>> >>>> See also http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/540390/ >>>> >>>> I can workaround that locally but I would like to learn what the best >>>> way to solve such issues would be. I don't see any >>>> preferred-minimal-versions.inc >>> >>> Recent glib-2.0 recipes has BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" set but we also have >>> glib-2.0-native recipes... I think that native ones should be dropped. >>> >> >> So what is happening to me now it that glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb gets >> selected and the more recent ones with BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" are >> discarded, right? >> > > Ok, I confirm this was actually the case, the old way to do native > recipes seems to have precedence on the new one, this is with bitbake > 1.8.18, don't know if that is dependent on bitbake version tho. > > Removing all glib-2.0-native packages makes gtk+-native-2.20.0-r8.0 > build ok. > >> If the -native recipes are going to be dropped should the >> BBCLASSEXTEND mechanism moved to some glib*.inc file? >> > > Should I just send a patch which blindly removes native > recipes for older versions, or try to port the BBCLASSEXTEND mechanism > to them? I don't know if I am fully comfortable with such changes in OE, > but I can always send a tentative patch. Porting them has a slight preference over deleting them. The -native recipes shouldn't be needed for things like maemo-compat, hence the 'slight' :) regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLvafcMkyGM64RGpERAroAAKCW7+h5AKr8VHhjoowsODwbKdX/+wCglfaW vf+ofTWZVrCCpZzw6mNyL/8= =BaGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----