From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6q6B-000768-Ci for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:05:36 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6q2c-0004cf-Nv for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:54 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:54 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1272392511.3865.574.camel@trini-m4400> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100412 Shredder/3.0.5pre In-Reply-To: <1272392511.3865.574.camel@trini-m4400> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] scsi headers, in glibc-dev or linux-libc-headers-dev? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:05:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27-04-10 20:21, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> Currently conflicting headers are both in glibc-dev and >> linux-libc-headers-dev, which isn't a good thing. According to the >> interwebs we should use the linux-libc-headers version. >> >> Anyone opposed to removing the scsi headers from glibc? It would >> basically involve reverting >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=b8bb2a62b3916470c752bd79d31322b4358fc676 >> and >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=83f41716ab6a2a9d83d4ff044dcef00595ecfeb2 > > So, I did both of those after checking the interwebs and poking some > kernel folks (see comments in > http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 ). The question is, > did the kernel folks change their mind again I would guess so, since l-l-h 2.6.32 still has the headers.... > and we need to either drop > older linux-libc-headers (which I'll just assume is a no-go) or go back > to removing them in new enough linux-libc-headers. I have no real preference, but removing them from l-l-h would be the easiest option. My immediate problem is that I need to be able to install both glibc-dev and l-l-h-dev on the target to show off native qt4 compilation. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFL1zSaMkyGM64RGpERAnFdAJ40UWtXamdRU8oTLd9ILE1BdeApuwCeJo3M 4Cg9iYa3MeFktzS1H4hP+A0= =x1El -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----