From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPEKt-0003Ml-89 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:37:01 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPEGW-0002EK-6h for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:32:16 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:32:16 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:32:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100617121913.GA16207@rhein.zuhause.netz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100524 Shredder/3.0.6pre In-Reply-To: <20100617121913.GA16207@rhein.zuhause.netz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Proposal to remove libattr recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:37:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-06-10 14:19, Henning Heinold wrote: > Hi, > > the libattr from xfsprogs clashes with the attr recipe from udev That statement is confusing, I think you mean: "the libattr recipe in recipes/xfsprogs clashes with the attr recipe in recipes/udev" > and I can > find any recipe which uses libattr, besides libcap2 which could use attr > from udev too. So my proposal is to remove the libattr recipe and switch > libcap2 to use attr from udev. Attached are the two patches, to do it. libattr and attr build the same thing, I hadn't noticed 'libattr' when adding 'attr', so it's completely safe to remove either one. Since the attr one is newer your patches look good. For both: Acked-by: Koen Kooi regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMGhXHMkyGM64RGpERAluWAJ9696wd9V3w2h1C7IQMiZPk+HTW6ACfd/vd sIjXLPlqHboo11F2vJCPX54= =NYpe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----