From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: CFLAGS_append_arm = " -fforward-propagate " breaks sdk builds
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:47:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i0f0bp$b11$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
When using an old compiler (e.g. the one ubuntu 8.04LTS ships with),
zlib and ncurses fail to build because " -fforward-propagate" is not
recognized as an option.
This is due to:
CFLAGS_append_arm = " -fforward-propagate "
In the .inc files. My question: why does ncursus-sdk get that in cflags?!?!
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFMKwS5MkyGM64RGpERAkrUAJ9/6f9Xwfq31TooCkrx39tuOO+twACfeLGb
d7VMZZJgobUiZgNM1rfrLv8=
=t8GK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 8:47 Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-07-01 6:52 ` CFLAGS_append_arm = " -fforward-propagate " breaks sdk builds Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='i0f0bp$b11$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.