From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Mueller Subject: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51962 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755639Ab0GHO5R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:57:17 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OWsXL-0001Im-MH for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:57:15 +0200 Received: from cust.dyn.95-152-98-129.swisscomdata.ch ([95.152.98.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:57:15 +0200 Received: from thomas by cust.dyn.95-152-98-129.swisscomdata.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:57:15 +0200 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org hi wido i see you replacing "/etc/init.d/ceph" with "service ceph" . The service thing does not exist on debian. IMHO /etc/init.d/ceph working for all - so may we have it called /etc/init.d/ceph instead of "service ceph"? Or at least on debian specific pages please do not change it. - Thomas