From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObG7F-0002qu-6F for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:56:26 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObG77-000129-5d for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:56:17 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:56:17 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:56:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:56:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> <20100720070108.GE1512@excalibur.local> <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100611 Shredder/3.0.6pre In-Reply-To: <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:56:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-07-10 10:40, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:09, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 20-07-10 09:01, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> From the silence on this topic I gather that the interest to create a new branch >>> or change the process is quite low. >> >> I have an interest in a new stable branch, but no interest in changing >> the process. > > Fair enough. Lets handle the issues seperately for now. > >> The biggest problem is the .dev is halfway into big changes, e.g. >> halfway into new-style staging, > > Agreed. While I think we are more then halfway through with this. Recipes are > left but most of the active maintained are already done. NO numbers but my > feeling here. > >> halfway into packaged-staging rework, halfway into nativesdk, etc. > > These both are ongoing for quite some time already. I have to admit that I lost > track where they stand and what is still outstanding. > > So your suggestion is to wait until all three are done? 'Wait' is maybe the wrong word. I would try to do a call to arms to get more people interested into getting this done. I had hoped that the TSC would be more vocal about this, but we must do with the cards dealt. And of course the number of people screaming for a stable branch is an order of magnitude larger than the number of people that end up actually supporting it. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMRdUmMkyGM64RGpERAmlcAJ0TbmzdYV6Z8p+FdtCP1jwXWOdIowCfbEJ9 8Zyd7nsYgEZZfj2daMq+EdI= =gEzx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----