From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OlHy3-0004B4-8j for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:56:25 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OlHxl-00073L-Ul for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:56:05 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:56:05 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:56:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:55:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <47A90E34-ABBD-4D37-9F47-B1EF6BEFE198@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100718 Shredder/3.0.7pre In-Reply-To: <47A90E34-ABBD-4D37-9F47-B1EF6BEFE198@vanille-media.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: rename files dirs X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:56:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-08-10 10:39, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: >> Currently lots of our patches reside in a directory called files. >> Somewhere in the past koen explained me that that is not really proper >> (and I agree with them). > > I disagree with that. In fact I'd rather suggest the other way, which > is: Put them all into files/ unless you have a compelling reason not to, > i.e. the moment one patch does not apply any longer to all versions of > the recipes; then it should be moved to PN-PV directory. What's wrong with putting those patches in PN/ instead of files/? Having them in files/ significantly threatens all efforts to clean up the recipes/ structure :( -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMak6cMkyGM64RGpERAi7ZAKC3znJEhz9R+E+ogbSIk+CFNhscJwCeNzU5 bj8CdsrE7eEOUc9QyPoJ2JE= =R/wu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----