From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpNHM-0004rc-12 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:25:12 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpNGs-0004Op-LR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:24:42 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:24:42 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:24:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100729 Shredder/3.0.7pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFD] increased dependency checking X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:25:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28-08-10 16:55, Chris Larson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> As usual you're completely ignoring the impact of this when using >> package management, which is probably why you still are clueless why >> your openssl fiasco is so much work to fix for distro maintainers. > > > If someone is missing something, then explain it to them. Whining and > calling people clueless does absolutely nothing for the project but alienate > developers. If you need to take out your frustration, buy a punching bag, > don't do it on the mailing list, please. And Chris, you don't have much right to say anything about this, since I raised my frustration with all this to the TSC almost two weeks ago, and I have only heard from Holger something and like "I haven't followed OE the past months". I haven't heard anything else, so keep getting more and more frustrated by frans moving goal posts ("ack or nak", "nak with explanation" "only naks from flawless maintainers") with the TSC doing seemingly nothing. I do *not* have the time to read oe-devel daily, nor to do proper test builds within a day. Especially not with the current mega patches posted for review. I must admit that them being posted for review is an improvement, but by the looks of it the respective maintainers don't get a say since they aren't doing a perfect job. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMeSoyMkyGM64RGpERAoVtAKCL+pF8wx34pS6hSi/+HtA3vXwNSQCeMhgi dR0qTSGHVO3iokRIYAd1FnU= =YA8h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----