From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqMKj-00073t-Qk for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:36:46 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqMKD-0002J9-6I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:36:13 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:36:13 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:36:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201008271556.24288.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <201008301816.41691.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100729 Shredder/3.0.7pre In-Reply-To: <201008301816.41691.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] clutter: Bump revisions to latest stable & cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:36:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30-08-10 18:16, Andreas Mueller wrote: > 1. One of the reasons which lead me to the huge patches was my wish to remove versions from recipe names and prevent from inconsistency. E.g If I would only post clutter_1.2.12.bb it > would not be build in case I want clutter-box2d. What is the reason behind this naming-style? Is it still required with stable releases of clutter? It is used to seperate the clutter api/abi change. 0.8 is parallel installable with 1.0 (0.9 is 1.0rc), so the naming is there to support both kinds of clutter. What I wanted to do, but didn't find time for: 1) name the clutter 0.8 series clutter-*-0.8 2) name the post 0.8 series clutter-* That should be safe to do since clutter 1.2 is supposed to be compatible with 1.0. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMfL7wMkyGM64RGpERAi2fAJwNrwNKqfQfNaLGIAMbRP24BY9QfQCeMJ5F LbSlxfGa14D6A8tSD5ni8NQ= =M7BW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----