All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: patch to fix libstdc++ problem, was Re: Images no longer automatically include libstdc++6
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:48:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <i6ielv$sld$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinELVSoGrq1km6dFpXGF524h328t+TBM4p32inz@mail.gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12-09-10 13:27, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/9/12 Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 12-09-10 10:34, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 
>>> Haven't had time to test this yet, but I feel at least a PR bump is
>>> missing (or perhaps a set of PR bumps)
>>
>> Since it would require a PR bump for everything that is built with gcc,
>> I'm going to say:
>>
>> That's what DISTRO_PR is for, which is up to distro maintainers to bump.
> 
> Still I feel PR or INC_PR bumps of the affected gcc recipes is
> appropriate, if only to fix it for distro's that do not immediately
> bump DISTRO_PR.
> We have quite some distro's and not all are maintained equally well,
> so I can imagine it'll take some time for them to bump
> Actually some distro's seem orphaned, so for those it might never
> happen and bumping the GCC PR's at least will give them the fix too.

It won't, since you need to rebuild everything that uses gcc. Bumping PR
for gcc-cross would just give people a false sense of security. I'm not
against bumping PR for gcc-cross, I'm just saying that it doesn't come
close to fixing the problem at hand, which is packages with missing
dependencies (libgcc for normal ones, libstdc++ for c++ ones,
libgfortran for fortran ones, etc).

> Thinking of it let's see how many distro's actually use DISTRO_PR:
> ../../conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".6"
> ../../conf/distro/kaeilos-2010.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".1"
> ../../conf/distro/kaeilos.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".5"
> ../../conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".7"
> ../../conf/distro/shr.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".5"
> 
> So that is 5 out of the 32 recipes.
> Even one of your own (angstrom-2008.1-legacy.conf) does ot use DISTRO_PR

Do you know how requires work in OE?

conf/distro$ grep require angstrom-2008.1-legacy.conf
require conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMjL3+MkyGM64RGpERAsRvAJ43TZNi07Md1wcPxdz5T6KaYYl8AwCgvNLY
X+Hd1AJVQULZ0BDAiiU6X5A=
=hIhF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-12 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-06 22:21 Images no longer automatically include libstdc++6 Steve Sakoman
2010-09-06 22:52 ` J. L. 
2010-09-07  5:54 ` Khem Raj
2010-09-07  8:20   ` J. L. 
2010-09-07 12:52   ` Koen Kooi
2010-09-07 16:18     ` Khem Raj
2010-09-07 19:03       ` Koen Kooi
2010-09-08  6:01         ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-08 14:09         ` pieterg
2010-09-08 14:33           ` Philip Balister
2010-09-11  1:29             ` Dallas Foley
2010-09-11  7:09               ` Koen Kooi
2010-09-11  7:46                 ` patch to fix libstdc++ problem, was " Koen Kooi
2010-09-12  8:34                   ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-12  9:11                     ` Koen Kooi
2010-09-12 11:27                       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-12 11:48                         ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-09-12 12:11                           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-12 12:27                         ` Philip Balister
2010-09-12 12:49                           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-12 13:04                             ` Philip Balister
2010-09-12 13:23                               ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-12 18:52                   ` Koen Kooi
2010-09-13  6:23                     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-13  7:22                       ` Graham Gower
2010-09-12 21:08                   ` pieterg
2010-09-12 23:56                     ` dfoley
2010-09-13  6:01                   ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='i6ielv$sld$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.