From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6NoL-0000v9-Na for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:37 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6Nnr-0005ZT-Oe for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:03 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:03 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:25:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:23:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080310FFA839@dlee06.ent.ti.com> <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080310FFA874@dlee06.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100822 Shredder/3.0.7pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Question about OVERRIDES precedence X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:25:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13-10-10 23:38, Chris Larson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Maupin, Chase wrote: > >> That was my thought as well but I can consistently cause this issue. I >> have tested a quick change that seems to fix the issue by reversing the list >> before it is used in the for loop. My change was: > > > From discussion on IRC, we think we should just reverse the definition of > OVERRIDES in OE, this avoids compatibility issues associated with changing > the implementation. Isn't the definition covered in the bitbake docs? I'm in favour of fixing bitbake instead working around it in OE. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMtwRCMkyGM64RGpERAhyDAJ0ZKsVJEzs2Fo8iXR7F32ijePz+lwCeMuHT vfpaqzI6gh8aKRBwE5h1WA4= =9m/w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----