From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7nHa-0005lu-OO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:49:35 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7nH2-0001Nh-6o for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:49:00 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:49:00 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:49:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:48:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1287353716-27717-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> <4CBC1FBE.9020808@opendreambox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101002 Shredder/3.0.9pre In-Reply-To: <4CBC1FBE.9020808@opendreambox.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfribidi-0.10.4: update recipe, fix packaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:49:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18-10-10 12:21, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 10/18/2010 09:22 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 18-10-10 00:15, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>> * added LICENSE >>> * removed configure patch >>> * use lib_package and binconfig to package all installed files >> >> What's the upgrade path? I assume package names have changes due to this. > > I guess my patch description wasn't clear enough. > > The previously unpackaged files ${bindir}/fribidi and > ${bindir}/fribidi-config are now packaged into libfribidi-bin and > libfribidi-dev, respectively. > > The only file which moved to a different package is libfribidi.a, from > libfribidi-static to libfribidi-dev. Well, .a files are supposed to go into -static, not into -dev. > Does this change require special treatment for upgrades? Every time you change packaging you need to make sure upgrade paths are intact. Especially with libraries. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMvCYQMkyGM64RGpERAoo5AJ9+DLGIs6fcpMFzd0zu4rHZ1R6WnwCfW8MM Td+T9s7UaTtrWvUyrH/0wCc= =4fBZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----