From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i9p1d0$7q4$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Recipes/linux is a mess and recipes/u-boot is as well. It would be a
nice topic for OEDEM to see if we discuss switching to a poky BSP model.
It would boil down to:
1 base bblayer with shared files:
* conf/machine/include
* recipes/linux/*.inc
1 bblayer per machine or SOC_FAMILY containing:
* machine.conf
* first and second stage bootloaders
* kernel
So, what are peoples thoughts on this? I haven't thought this through
myself, so feel free to point out any show stoppers.
I do not want this to turn into a "splitting the metadata" discussion,
while I'm all for that, it really is a seperate effort and discussion.
But any bblayer style split would benefit from OE being a collection of
git submodules instead of a monolithic tree[1].
Regards,
Koen
[1] Provided git submodules stop sucking so hard in future git versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFMwAjgMkyGM64RGpERAs3LAKCBtFoOPe49JO/K3SlC0euYs8XOCgCeKLsF
UMRKOIhRMMwUgrh5RsQ8dEw=
=nlIb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 9:33 Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-10-21 9:52 ` [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 9:59 ` Koen Kooi
2010-10-21 10:04 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 10:17 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 10:20 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 10:38 ` Richard Purdie
2010-10-21 12:01 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 13:46 ` Maupin, Chase
2010-10-21 14:21 ` Chris Larson
2010-10-21 16:11 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-11-01 21:04 ` Tom Rini
2010-10-21 10:48 ` Richard Purdie
2010-10-21 11:22 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 14:21 ` Chris Larson
2010-10-21 10:36 ` Richard Purdie
2010-11-02 7:02 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-02 20:46 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:14 ` Eric Bénard
2010-11-02 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:21 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 8:15 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 18:59 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 20:17 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 20:44 ` Khem Raj
2010-11-03 21:06 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 22:13 ` Khem Raj
2010-11-04 7:48 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:57 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='i9p1d0$7q4$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.