From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJOEf-0002Yc-T1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:30:33 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJODb-0004br-Qa for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:29:23 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:29:23 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:29:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4CE3A6DE.2070203@xora.org.uk> <1290074903.3183.202.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101031 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <1290074903.3183.202.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Preparing for release - Freeze on master X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:30:35 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:30:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18-11-10 11:08, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 11:26 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> Should we create a release branch before we release and solidify that ? > > Yes, please do that. We discussed this issue at yesterday's TSC meeting > (full minutes to follow shortly) and the consensus was that trying to > enforce a complete freeze on master at short notice is not going to be > practical. > > Obviously the exact process you use is up to you, but I would suggest > something along the lines of: > > 1. make a stabilisation branch from some semi-arbitrary point, maybe one > of the existing weekly test versions. At OEDEM we decided that there would be no branch, only a tag, could the TSC elaborate why they are going against that? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFM5lF3MkyGM64RGpERAr/pAJwIE46snPNsW42xpR6J3wKJGxpw0gCgkvhZ MFR65AifpMR/v69fhN6JwNQ= =aCtY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----