From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJOJe-0005MI-CB for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJOIa-0007cA-4T for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34:32 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34:32 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101031 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: release-2010.12 branch ready for testing X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:35:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18-11-10 22:27, Khem Raj wrote: > Hello all, > > The work branch for upcoming 2010.12 release has been created. Why was this created? We were *very* clear at OEDEM that there would be no branch, only a tag. Why was this changed? I only see some vague handwaving from the TSC (well, from Phil, saying it was the TSC) who didn't consult the OE developers at all. The whole point of releases was that they are based of a tag from .dev, not some random branch. Again, why was that changed? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFM5lKsMkyGM64RGpERApvMAJ43a/hkKcQwWaddIANExDaEbLsECQCeJZvG F6e/1Z8cFoj3D78lV7Io3a4= =PwWn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----