From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTEZG-000273-Qe for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:12:27 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTEXi-0004II-76 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:50 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:50 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080329DB6BBC@dlee06.ent.ti.com> <201012152240.45068.roman@khimov.ru> <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080329DB6BEA@dlee06.ent.ti.com> <201012152339.06515.roman@khimov.ru> <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080329E92ADA@dlee06.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101031 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <131E5DFBE7373E4C8D813795A6AA7F080329E92ADA@dlee06.ent.ti.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] move openssl.cnf file into base openssl package X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:12:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16-12-10 15:04, Maupin, Chase wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of >> Roman I Khimov >> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:39 PM >> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] move openssl.cnf file into base openssl package >> >> В сообщении от Среда 15 декабря 2010 22:47:05 автор Maupin, Chase написал: >>>> Missed that change. Seems wrong to me. And I still think that it >> belongs >>>> to >>>> libcrypto, not openssl since you can easily not install openssl binary >>>> and still use it with tuned openssl.cnf in your apps. >>> >>> So it seems like there are two packages that need this default >> openssl.cnf >>> file, the libcrypto and openssl packages. Would it perhaps be a better >>> idea to pull the configuration file into its own package and then set >> the >>> RDEPENDS for the libcrypto and openssl packages to use the openssl >>> configuration package? That way you can still have multiple versions of >>> libcrypto (like Koen was trying to do) and have the default file shared >>> between both packages that need it. >> >> openssl is rdepending on libcrypto anyway (it's linked with it and I don't >> think it'll change any time soon). But configs for different versions can >> be >> conflicting, so I'm not sure this kind of approach solves anything. > > I noticed that. I think the only thing that putting this into its own package would solve is addressing Koen's comment about having multiple versions of libcrypto installed. > > Koen, can you comment on your change that moved the openssl.cnf file to the misc package? Do you still need to be able to install multiple versions of libcrypto? Yes, I still need to be able to do that, couldn't you just add an rrecommend for -misc? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNCh3dMkyGM64RGpERAseRAJ9KEl9B6YuGjRmZNzK3mFGhMZlAlwCfYJqK 1MNv3HdFqJteWCrn+kFD48Q= =eo6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----