From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUxOj-0001xY-SO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:16:41 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUxOe-0004LD-Aw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:16:36 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:16:36 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:16:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:16:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D0F8AB7.1020104@xora.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101031 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: [RFC] meta-openembedded layer for yocto hosted on oe.org X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:16:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-12-10 18:16, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Nice piece of work & a good plan but... > > Who will be the owners/maintainers of the layers? My intention was that the meta-openembedded layer will be maintained by the people interested in it. There will be a new MAINTAINERS file inside listing who feels responsible for various recipes. > An alternate approach would be to let the stuff live in poky-extras. > See this proposal from RP: > http://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg00286.html The poky-extras thing is not what I want, and more importantly, I don't want to start diluting the OE brand. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNEGJWMkyGM64RGpERApHaAJ9Nk5bO08BlF40T3LH8S9ymgRFsvwCdGeQ3 WREzWeCb8t1INOGEfxILgTM= =3PyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----