From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhUCu-0005J9-VE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:44:17 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PhUCC-0005s3-Kj for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:43:32 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:43:32 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:43:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:43:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D36F9BE.1010601@xora.org.uk> <4D3DAB2A.3070303@balister.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <4D3DAB2A.3070303@balister.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: openembedded-core git repository X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:44:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24-01-11 17:39, Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/19/2011 06:48 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> Hi, this email is sent as an ordinary member of OE. >> >> It seems to be on a technical level we are agreed that we should split >> parts of OE out into the so called openembedded-core which will have a >> stricter commit access and higher QA requirements on changes. >> >> I therefore think it is time to actually create the repository and let >> the people who are interested in merging the good stuff from poky with >> the good stuff from openembedded to create our "core". I don't think >> there is any need to wait on the political part of the Yocto/OE >> collaboration as its something we have agreed in principal to do anyway. >> >> I would request then that the TSC drive this forward with the server >> admins and create this repo so work can happen. > > > Has anything happened on this email? Has the TSC had a meeting to > discuss? I know it has only been a week, but people are starting to do > work based on these ideas and need some support from the TSC. At this point I'm going to call for a vote of non confidence in the TSC. If they can't be bothered to speak up in an important matter like this, we'd be better of without them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNPfJ4MkyGM64RGpERAr5bAKCJlqjvcXHIbrZR5jQjAEAhBp4NdQCffnW0 JGXHmRMZYLsptyPpDrqKKkY= =7ASP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----