From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PiFb3-0005HM-Te for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:20:23 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiFaG-0004dI-0J for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:19:32 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:19:31 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:19:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:19:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D4092E8.8040207@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <4D4092E8.8040207@atmel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: Patching from a file containing a compressed directory (.tar.bz2) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:20:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26-01-11 22:32, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > Trying to change the at91 linux recipes. > The "experimental" patches to be added on top of the "maxim" patch > can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.at91.com/ and that file > is generated from a directory of patches, which should be applied > in alphabetical order. > > When the "obvious" SRC_URI is used: > > ftp://ftp.at91.com/.tar.bz2;apply=yes \ > > the files do not get applied in alphabetical order. > > It looks to me like they get applied in reverse order, but I did > not check carefully. > I tried adding a "series" file, and recompress, but that failed as > well. > > Any clue on how to get the patches applied in alphabetical order? > > If the patches are in a subdirectory to the recipe, and applied > manually > everything is OK, but that seems to be a shame to have to resort to > that. We don't want such behaviour, putting the patches in OE and adding them to SRC_URI is the only acceptable way to do this. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNQLoEMkyGM64RGpERAo3fAJoDwcnY3HrWprnEOFzwcp1+VU/biQCfd0oZ dJ7RQ/b2cMdBSdP3NFQsx6M= =ZC5T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----