From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PxyJv-0007Kh-6p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:07:39 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxyI8-00008p-90 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:05:48 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:05:48 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:05:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:05:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20110311081950.GG7353@excalibur.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <20110311081950.GG7353@excalibur.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: OE Bugzilla Future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:07:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-03-11 09:19, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > This topic has come up several times now and it did come up again during a TSC > meeting yesterday. > > It feels like the current OE bugzilla is not in really good shape. The question > is how we are going to handle this. On the one hand it might be good to remove > as it holds a lot outdated informations and it seems developers are not using it > at all. > > On the other hand this would cut off a service for atcual users of OE. > > If we can find a group of people that is willing to clean the current bugzilla > up improve it and make sure that problems in it are actually worked on it still > have a chance to stay. We need a clear maintainership for it and bugs need > atcually be worked. > > Comments? Volunteers? Just kill it already, for OE-core we can use the yocto bugzilla which has dedicated maintainers. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNeeXaMkyGM64RGpERAmHJAJ4m4K4tYZTl4wLOV/HknGW1yZpjSQCdHGKn PQfCcV3HqgNIrwFiVDplc2Y= =tOhk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----