From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0iBQ-000899-Sn for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:30:12 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0i9j-0007YS-SH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:27 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:27 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6F3B187F-5497-4504-9EEB-99204CCC815B@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <6F3B187F-5497-4504-9EEB-99204CCC815B@vanille-media.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: blacklist.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:30:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18-03-11 20:24, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > Salut, > > the blacklisting of packages as found in angstrom.bbclass > is pretty helpful and would be beneficial to all kinds > of distribution configurations in OE. So include it in your $DISTRO. > Would there be > a strong objection of renaming this to blacklist.bbclass? Why is a rename needed? SHR is already using it as is. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNg9x+MkyGM64RGpERApRIAKCaBrrX6A/yyoIMuRrELdeJCTqs1gCggw93 q+51Hc05SmGVgocnoEJeR10= =+KOd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----