From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0vzB-0003cE-Bn for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:14:29 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0vxQ-0007Wr-3W for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:12:40 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:12:40 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:12:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: [2011.03-maintenance] Re: cmake in stable X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:14:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19-03-11 10:58, Maksym Parkachov wrote: > Hi everyone, > > could someone, please, cherry-pick following commits to the > 2011.03-maintenance branch as the cmake is broken in this branch. > > 7ce3543709765f37e359b2fa449216c834a5910e > 37a042ec115f100a0aef606ee7f88cad560f0d1e I added those to my staging tree and will do some test builds. Tom, if those test builds are successfull, do you want to pick those 2 up yourself or do you want me to include them in the next pull request? regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNhKu8MkyGM64RGpERAnwgAKCLOUEDhIxyVkj40YOs70kt6bE3gQCfVbzR rSZmErWBUirvq4vu+m8vh3A= =lZt9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----