[PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Siddharth Heroor]

From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>

* The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
---
 recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
index cd6ad6e..fc9b908 100644
--- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
+++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 DESCRIPTION = "TI Inter Process Ccommunication (IPC) Mechanisms (for Uni- and Multi- Processor Configurations)"
 HOMEPAGE = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ipc/index.html"
 SECTION = "devel"
-LICENSE = "TI" 
+LICENSE = "BSD" 
 
 require ti-paths.inc
 require ti-staging.inc
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 2/3] TI IPC: Add missing dependencies

[Siddharth Heroor]

From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>

* The IPC software is for Sys/Bios and is dependent on Sys/Bios.
* To Build IPC and stage it we need XDCTools and C6000 Codegen.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
---
 recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
index fc9b908..2a23a9b 100644
--- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
+++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/ipc_${PV}"
 
 SRC_URI = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ipc/${PV}/exports/ipc_setuplinux_${PV}.bin;name=ipcbin"
 
+DEPENDS = "ti-sysbios ti-cgt6x ti-xdctools"
 BINFILE="ipc_setuplinux_${PV}.bin"
 TI_BIN_UNPK_CMDS="Y: qY:workdir:Y"
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 3/3] TI IPC: Add version 1.22.04.25

[Siddharth Heroor]

From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>

* This version is one the first versions of TI IPC available.
* Fix the installer installer command in the include file.
  Since this is the first version available on OE, changing
  this does not affect any other versions.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
---
 recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc           |    2 +-
 recipes/ti/ti-ipc_1.22.04.25.bb |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 recipes/ti/ti-ipc_1.22.04.25.bb

diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
index 2a23a9b..0bc6218 100644
--- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
+++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ip
 
 DEPENDS = "ti-sysbios ti-cgt6x ti-xdctools"
 BINFILE="ipc_setuplinux_${PV}.bin"
-TI_BIN_UNPK_CMDS="Y: qY:workdir:Y"
+TI_BIN_UNPK_CMDS="Y: q:workdir:Y"
 
 do_install() {
     install -d ${D}${IPC_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}
diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc_1.22.04.25.bb b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc_1.22.04.25.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1573dce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc_1.22.04.25.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+require ti-ipc.inc
+
+PV = "1_22_04_25"
+
+SRC_URI[ipcbin.md5sum] = "aaa7f3776794a92b4226cd923c7cd956"
+SRC_URI[ipcbin.sha256sum] = "b33e25e0330719c2857a5ca3abccd03fe1b55a9300b2f825707f2bc64b84c883"
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Paul Menzel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1041 bytes --]

Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
> From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
> 
> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.

Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed?

> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
> ---
>  recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
> index cd6ad6e..fc9b908 100644
> --- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
> +++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  DESCRIPTION = "TI Inter Process Ccommunication (IPC) Mechanisms (for Uni- and Multi- Processor Configurations)"
>  HOMEPAGE = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ipc/index.html"
>  SECTION = "devel"
> -LICENSE = "TI" 
> +LICENSE = "BSD" 
>  
>  require ti-paths.inc
>  require ti-staging.inc

All Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>. I would
push them or do the TI people want to push these?


Thanks,

Paul

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24-03-11 14:49, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
>> From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>
>> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.
> 
> Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed?

The "LICENSE = TI" bit in the recipes is 90% a copy/paste from another
recipe. For most things we use BSD, but since that is a "fill in"
license I choose "TI" or "TI BSD" while I waited for the interna;
opensource review board to tell me which term to use. While waiting for
that the original recipes got copied a lot :)

A short rundown, not 100% accurate, but a good rule of thumb:

BSD: things that gets put into the codecserver or linked to by apps
GPLv2 or GPLv2+BSD: Kernel modules
"TI": compiler, various binary only IP, etc
Eclipse: XDC

And then we have distribution license "Technology Software Publically
Available" or TSPA which means you can download it without any login or
registration. This is not a source license.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNi1w8MkyGM64RGpERApIpAJ9HAxmnM01wjgmSvNfk9j7fl1ydqgCfSZAX
V1wHf3tSSrt/4eSXXYh3Mtk=
=IudE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Siddharth Heroor]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Paul Menzel
<paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
> All Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>. I would
> push them or do the TI people want to push these?
Please go ahead and push them.

> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>

Thanks and Regards,
Sid

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24-03-11 14:49, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
>> From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>
>> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.
> 
> Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
>> index cd6ad6e..fc9b908 100644
>> --- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
>> +++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>  DESCRIPTION = "TI Inter Process Ccommunication (IPC) Mechanisms (for Uni- and Multi- Processor Configurations)"
>>  HOMEPAGE = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ipc/index.html"
>>  SECTION = "devel"
>> -LICENSE = "TI" 
>> +LICENSE = "BSD" 
>>  
>>  require ti-paths.inc
>>  require ti-staging.inc
> 
> All Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>. I would
> push them or do the TI people want to push these?

Please don't push any TI patches without my or Denys' Ack/SOB.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNi4rWMkyGM64RGpERAu2LAJ9x+/eqEk+5Dh5Ae68O8GuSRYQhngCfcMco
4DpChXARi7jlI9jDXSZWKJs=
=cXET
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Siddharth Heroor]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24-03-11 14:49, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
>>> From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>>
>>> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.
>>
>> Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> All Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>. I would
>> push them or do the TI people want to push these?
>
> Please don't push any TI patches without my or Denys' Ack/SOB.

Can you please consider pushing this patchset into the 2011.03
maintenance branch as well?

Thanks and Regards,
Sid

Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field.

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 25-03-11 12:08, Siddharth Heroor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 24-03-11 14:49, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor:
>>>> From: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI.
>>>
>>> Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed?
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <heroor@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> All Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>. I would
>>> push them or do the TI people want to push these?
>>
>> Please don't push any TI patches without my or Denys' Ack/SOB.
> 
> Can you please consider pushing this patchset into the 2011.03
> maintenance branch as well?

Done, see pull request #5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNjIBcMkyGM64RGpERAjhEAJ9ORWYWurljq0uYuRWixQUVXz/ZQwCeK3Vu
rExeIo7bL9vpNj4ohwy7Uz4=
=X7kB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----