From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2p8f-00083U-QO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:20:06 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2p6p-0000es-Fo for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:11 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:11 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:17:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1300971676-31774-1-git-send-email-heroor@gmail.com> <1300974563.3795.29.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <1300974563.3795.29.camel@mattotaupa> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] TI IPC: Fix License field. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:20:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24-03-11 14:49, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 18:31 +0530 schrieb Siddharth Heroor: >> From: Siddharth Heroor >> >> * The correct license for TI IPC is BSD and not TI. > > Was the original license a mistake or was it relicensed? > >> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor >> --- >> recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc >> index cd6ad6e..fc9b908 100644 >> --- a/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc >> +++ b/recipes/ti/ti-ipc.inc >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >> DESCRIPTION = "TI Inter Process Ccommunication (IPC) Mechanisms (for Uni- and Multi- Processor Configurations)" >> HOMEPAGE = "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/ipc/index.html" >> SECTION = "devel" >> -LICENSE = "TI" >> +LICENSE = "BSD" >> >> require ti-paths.inc >> require ti-staging.inc > > All Acked-by: Paul Menzel . I would > push them or do the TI people want to push these? Please don't push any TI patches without my or Denys' Ack/SOB. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNi4rWMkyGM64RGpERAu2LAJ9x+/eqEk+5Dh5Ae68O8GuSRYQhngCfcMco 4DpChXARi7jlI9jDXSZWKJs= =cXET -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----