From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5FvC-0003Ns-Q9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:20:16 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5FgX-0008TH-JU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:05:05 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:05:05 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:05:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:04:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110331074506.GB23178@denix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request for new TI machines, angstrom and qt4 fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:20:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 31-03-11 12:51, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Adding new machines on a maintenance branch seems somewhat odd as new > somewhat conflicts with maintenance. > is this what we want? And if so, what about adding new recipes? Since you aren't using, developing or supporting 2011.03-maintenance, I strongly object to your usage of 'we'. Furthermore, this isn't the first time that new machines would get added to 2011.03-maintenance. People really should read http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/2011.03-maintenance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNlF/PMkyGM64RGpERAh/tAKCwDlaBHSrMDziiP1j/lHAga2zyqQCfT+Ke FRylHre7/eQRdNlkDw3Xe94= =6IbX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----