From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCBC4C8009D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:05:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWvPP-0000oL-VL for poky@pokylinux.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:05:47 +0200 Received: from 79.167.211.68 ([79.167.211.68]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:05:47 +0200 Received: from gmane by 79.167.211.68 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:05:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: poky@pokylinux.org From: Robert Berger Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:05:31 +0300 Organization: Reliable Embedded Systems Message-ID: References: <4DF80B84.9000304@linux.intel.com> <4DF890F0.1020307@reliableembeddedsystems.com> <4DF8E01F.8040209@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.167.211.68 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bernard 5.0.1 and beagle-xm rev c X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: gmane@reliableembeddedsystems.com List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:05:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jason, On 06/15/2011 09:26 PM, Jason Kridner wrote: > > This thread has been moving faster than me. :) > > You can use mainline u-boot. There are some minor missing features, but > I did do some playing with mainline u-boot and xM rev C about a month > ago and it was good. The version might not be reported properly, but > the default was updated to be if it was an unknown xM revision, it would > default to the latest. Old u-boot versions had a bug where they would > revert to a really old version. If the default was the latest, there > would have been no breakage as no u-boot dependencies changed between xM > rev A/B and xM rev C. > mainline u-boot sounds good. What kernel did you use for your tests? Regards, Robert ..."Q: What is IBM's definition of a man year? A: 720 programmers trying to finish the job before lunch." My public pgp key is available at: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90320BF1