From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QZl6B-00059s-Mz for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:41:43 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZl2W-0001k1-UX for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:37:52 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:37:52 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:37:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E03211B.40205@freyther.de> <1308828119.21613.138.camel@phil-desktop> <4E032546.6000308@freyther.de> <1308839149.21613.165.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101127 Shredder/3.0.11pre In-Reply-To: <1308839149.21613.165.camel@phil-desktop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: RFC One recipe with two git repository as sources X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:41:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23-06-11 16:25, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:36 +0200, Holger Freyther wrote: >> On 06/23/2011 01:21 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:18 +0200, Holger Freyther wrote: >>>> - destdir = os.path.join(destdir, "git/") >>>> + destsuffix = ud.parm.get("destsuffix", "git/") >>>> + print destsuffix >>>> + destdir = os.path.join(destdir, destsuffix) >>> >>> I think that "print" might be extraneous, but other than this your patch >>> looks awesome. I think this would resolve the problem that I was having >>> in. >> >> great, yeah the print is bogus and the question if and how this applies to >> fetch/git.py is also unresolved (i had a quick look but have not found the >> dirname it uses to create the tarball). > > I'm not entirely clear on what's going on with fetch vs fetch2 at all, > in terms of whether fetch is going away at some point or the two of them > are meant to be existing in parallel. Can one of the TSC überhackers > shed any light on what the intent is there? Fetch2 is being used in OE-core, fetch is there for "old-style" OE like .dev and 2011.03-maintenance. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOA0+0MkyGM64RGpERAsmAAJ9D/PrqNupsL/pIF6ClrD39r+RZhQCgpbM+ Rj2c9UxKldqANJJiua4rRNA= =xv3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----