From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R49bB-0001mh-BZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:55:17 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R49WA-0003ew-IR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:50:06 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:50:06 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:50:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:42:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1316081269.4523.54.camel@mattotaupa> <201109151120.09382.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 In-Reply-To: <201109151120.09382.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Subject: Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:55:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 15-09-11 12:20, Paul Eggleton schreef: > On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote: >> it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring >> to the same repository or not. > > I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have > just one name. > >> So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev >> or OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter > > oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic > of the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit > of "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, > whereas to me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my > personal vote is for OE-classic. OEbsolete :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOcdahMkyGM64RGpERAhgHAJ9WvlhqWWAmVJQlvUeqC4Ue6orxrACfSh09 gpzdp5Vipbbg5Znf6fca4MQ= =31CR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----