From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R49WM-0001V8-I1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:50:18 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R49RK-0001hg-KA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:45:06 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:45:06 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:45:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:44:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1316082725.4523.67.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 In-Reply-To: <1316082725.4523.67.camel@mattotaupa> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Subject: Re: Do we need a patch queue (Patchwork)? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:50:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 15-09-11 12:32, Paul Menzel schreef: > Dear OE folks, > > > (This is the last organizational message I will write today.) > > We currently have a patch queue/tracker called Patchwork [1][2] which > should be used according to the documentation in the Wiki. > > The current situation though is that nobody seems to use it anymore, i. > e. does not update the patch state. (Also because of some problems with > registration.) I do use it for meta-oe and if you have a look at http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe you'll see that it is quite up to date. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFOcdb7MkyGM64RGpERAmk5AJsEVuE99T8PGGtJOLxlgHutrdadMgCfW2xS CW3FXF0uwPzDc1pwHn36hvQ= =2uis -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----