From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RObRC-0007q5-Hi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:41:30 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RObL4-0002OB-NU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:35:10 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:35:10 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:35:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:27:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4EBC2FEF.5020405@kernelconcepts.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4EBC2FEF.5020405@kernelconcepts.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Subject: Re: RFC: Clean up omap3.inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:41:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 10-11-11 21:11, Florian Boor schreef: > Hi all, > > omap3.inc currently contains this line: > > EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS += "u-boot x-load" > > This makes it hard to build for an OMAP3 based machine without providing > a x-load configuration for it. Wrong. You can do the following in your machine.conf: require omap3.inc EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS = "whatever" to reset it. > Actually I do not think hardcoding a particular bootloader for a class of > SoC is a good idea at all. The selection whether a bootloader needs to be > build and which one to select should be a matter of the machine > configuration. > > Could we please get rid of this and fix the board descriptions? In OE classic, no. In meta-ti the cleanup is already underway. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFOvDOVMkyGM64RGpERAunKAKC7udUOfCyn4wLKlPYg5/kMJPSNEgCgqgp9 lFTgVwMfsUQuNuC6mI8VZrg= =ndzI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----