From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RPu08-00076s-LT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:42:56 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPttx-00051x-SC for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:36:33 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:36:33 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:36:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:36:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <99AD691F1FA415449470C6EA37B6FE4606D917@DNCE03.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <99AD691F1FA415449470C6EA37B6FE4606D917@DNCE03.ent.ti.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] bluez4_4.95.bb: new recipe for building bluez-4.95 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:42:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 13-11-11 08:55, Preskovsky, Vita schreef: > Ping to: [oe] [PATCH] bluez4_4.95.bb: new recipe for building bluez-4.95 Send an updated set of patches addressing all the feedback. Pinging patches without having done so doesn't help. > > Regards, Vita Preskovsky > > -----Original Message----- From: > openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Preskovsky, Vita Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 11:19 PM To: Paul Menzel > Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] > bluez4_4.95.bb: new recipe for building bluez-4.95 > > Paul, > > I'm subscribed to the list and receive mails from it, but I'm new to > arago and openembeded. I have a question about the right way to define > DEFAULT_PREFERENCE in recipes. In all bluez4_4.x recipes there is > definition of default preference as DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1", and > bitbake takes the last one. In the last recipe version 4.89 they defined > also angstrom default preference: DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_angstrom = "1" So > everyone, working under angstrom, as we do, compiles with the version > 4.89. We chose to work with version 4.95 (despite existence of 4.96) but > we don't want this recipe will be compiled as default, only for those who > will compile this recipe for specific machine as am180x-evm. So instead > of DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_angstrom I can define DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_am180x-evm > = "1", that meets our goal. Is this way more appropriate than I did > previously? > > Thank you, Vita. > > -----Original Message----- From: Paul Menzel > [mailto:paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 > 1:42 PM To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Preskovsky, > Vita; Vita Preskovsky Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] bluez4_4.95.bb: new > recipe for building bluez-4.95 > > Dear Vita, > > > are you reading the list or do I have to add your address to the CC > field? > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.10.2011, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Preskovsky, Vita: > >> Please see my answers bellow. > > thank you for your answer. > >> -----Original Message----- > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:32 PM > >> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] bluez4_4.95.bb: new recipe for building >> bluez-4.95 >> >> Dear Vita, >> >> >> thank you for your patch. >> >> Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2011, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Vita Preskovsky: >> >> Using >> >> bluez4: Add version 4.95 >> >> as the commit summary would be cleaner. Use `git commit --amend` to >> change that. >> >> Additionally you should elaborate more in the commit message what the >> patch is doing. >> >> 1. Have you tested it? Is it just an upgrade because of or does >> version 4.91 in the repository have any short comings so that it should >> be removed? >> >> I tested this recipe, and the reason I added this version is that we >> want to use this version of Bluez in our release. > > I guess you tested it using Ȧngström, so the old recipe can be removed. > Please note that oe-core already has version 4.96. > >>> Signed-off-by: Vita Preskovsky --- >>> recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 >>> files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 >>> recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb >>> >>> diff --git a/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb >>> b/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb new file mode 100644 index >>> 0000000..a682d6a --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes/bluez/bluez4_4.95.bb @@ >>> -0,0 +1,30 @@ +require bluez4.inc +SRC_URI = "\ + >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/bluetooth/bluez-${PV}.tar.gz \ >> >> 2. As far as I know kernel.org after the compromise presently does not >> provide that archive. So the recipe will not build unless there is a >> mirror somewhere. Do you know of a mirror? >> >> There are two possible locations for this package: >> http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/bluetooth/bluez-4.95.tar.gz >> >> >> http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/unstable/sources/bluez-4.95.tar.g >> z I changed the SRC_URI in my working directory for the first location >> and it worked fine. So with what location do you prefer the recipe >> will be released? > > I am unsure about the policy myself and I do not think an “OE mirror” has > that particular archive. > >>> + file://bluetooth.conf \ +" + +SRC_URI[md5sum] = >>> "341294b2849a04a4afff5c96bfbf30b2" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "d6ea9de410fc2bcd2620d709c2202893b218e2e6a55c3c0ce6bebd27fa4120f6" + >>> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" >> >> 3. Why? >>> +DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_angstrom = "1" >> >> 4. Have you talked to the Ȧngström maintainers? >> >> These two variables are defined in the previous version of bluez4 >> recipe: bluez4_4.89.bb. Without these two definitions in my recipe >> bitbake prefers the old recipe upon mine, which doesn't leave me a >> choice but to define these variables. > > The “correct” way would be to first add that recipe and then afterward > sent a patch to change the preferences which the Ȧngström maintainers > have to acknowledge. > >>> + +DEPENDS += "libsndfile1" + +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" + +# Not all >>> distros have a recent enough udev BTUDEV = " +--disable-udevrules" >>> +BTUDEV_angstrom = " --enable-udevrules" +BTUDEV_shr = " >>> --enable-udevrules" + +EXTRA_OECONF += "${BTUDEV}" >>> +do_configure_append(){ + echo "#define >>> LIBUDEV_I_KNOW_THE_API_IS_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE" >> +${S}/config.h } + >>> +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "\ + ${base_libdir}/udev/.debug \ + >>> ${libdir}/*/.debug \ +" >> >> Otherwise this recipe looks good. Is it planned for branch >> 2011.03-maintenance? > > > Thanks, > > Paul _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel > mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel > mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk7A7yAACgkQMkyGM64RGpGJZwCgiF56zT1WLLiMfbkEOzWwtUCy ShMAnA6aeHK81PaDXUUglKtmi68Pqwa+ =xYOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----