From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTdSh-0005iC-1Y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:51:51 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTdMN-0003bn-69 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:45:19 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:45:19 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:45:19 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4ECD76E2.3040001@opendreambox.org> <0C757E680E33864AB113392C7E83F910BE5242@GSX300A.mxchg.m.corp> <1322134409.3391.21.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:51:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 24-11-11 12:43, Otavio Salvador schreef: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:33, Paul Menzel < > paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2011, 09:12 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador: >>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:23, Hauser, Wolfgang (external) wrote: >>> >>>> I would vote for an open classic master for bugfixing too, our >>>> project based on 2011.03-maintenance goes into the final phase and >>>> to switch to oe-core, the budged is not available jet. >>> >>> I also believe oe-classic master ought to be read-only as soon as >> possible; >>> I understand that people are using it but the soonner we make it >> read-only, >>> sooner people will move to oe-core otherwise people will keep >>> starting >> new >>> project on it and it will never die. >> >> You seem to use OE-core and meta-oe already so I understand your point >> of view. Martin, Koen, Andreas and you are doing the major work for >> meta-oe and not a lot of other people contribute. >> >> In my opinion it is a bad sign to force people to switch. OE-core and >> meta-oe should be so appealing that they switch by themselves. My >> impression from reading the list and from IRC is that a lot of people >> still have objections and are not totally comfortable. Good community >> management would be to listen to these people then try to find >> solutions and implement them. People then should come by themselves. >> > > In fact I use both. The projects running at oe-classic are working well > and will be kept running that way but all new ones are based on oe-core > + meta-oe. With both my angstrom and TI hat on: I use both 2011.03-maintenance and OE-core. > I am not against oe-classic maintainence branch and people contributting > new fixes but I am against the work on new features and recipes being > put on master branch. Exactly! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk7OgqAACgkQMkyGM64RGpF3TgCfWAfwcn7rIZD4cdfHVf1GQW1h PiIAnRrWDAeKvSeSoitXe8JC3ZJsnRY0 =9/Cy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----