From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTdXK-0005zG-UW for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:56:39 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTdR0-0005pT-F1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:50:06 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:50:06 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:50:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:47:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1322134409.3391.21.camel@mattotaupa> <1341768.l3QXe5jHAh@helios> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <1341768.l3QXe5jHAh@helios> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:56:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 24-11-11 12:43, Paul Eggleton schreef: > On Thursday 24 November 2011 12:33:29 Paul Menzel wrote: >> You seem to use OE-core and meta-oe already so I understand your point >> of view. Martin, Koen, Andreas and you are doing the major work for >> meta-oe and not a lot of other people contribute. >> >> In my opinion it is a bad sign to force people to switch. OE-core and >> meta-oe should be so appealing that they switch by themselves. My >> impression from reading the list and from IRC is that a lot of people >> still have objections and are not totally comfortable. Good community >> management would be to listen to these people then try to find >> solutions and implement them. People then should come by themselves. > > Let's not get carried away. In the current discussion it seems the main > objection to switching from several people is that they are in the middle > or close to the end of their development cycle on products that depend on > OE- classic; it's totally understandable that those people can't switch > at this time. I'm not entirely convinced those people can't use the > 2011.3 maintenance branch for those purposes however. Most, if not all people objecting to OE-classic closing seem to be on 2011.03-maintenance already. The confusion seems to be rooted into not paying attention when Tom said fixes for the maintenance branch can go through oe-core/meta-oe/whatever as well. That is even mentioned in the damn wiki for the maintenance branch! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk7Og0gACgkQMkyGM64RGpETAgCfX1jflPTMJCZndnIKZpKWTAvR 2psAoLqc0id3iCacEOuVu9bZVBPVwzBq =AUUz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----