From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rb6me-000452-9v for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:35:20 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rb6fw-0003XW-S3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:28:24 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:28:24 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:28:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:28:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 3/4] dropbear: bump epoch to ensure an upgrade path and cleanup packaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:35:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 13-12-11 19:51, Otavio Salvador schreef: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 16:45, Koen Kooi > wrote: > >> I'd really like to avoid PE in bbappends for obvious reasons. Can we >> get this into OE-core instead? >> > > I can send a patch to them for this but in meanwhile this ought to be > merged as currently dropbear is at broken state. No, a PE should only get added once and with care. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk7pr6IACgkQMkyGM64RGpHgjwCfZeKt8oSrufiyWEMlWOTnp6D3 lIAAn0MKN4wpytvMSiyfbg0dkYnN2O5V =86zF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----