From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264656AbUGHP4r (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:56:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264627AbUGHP4q (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:56:46 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37774 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264697AbUGHP4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:56:37 -0400 To: Michael Poole Cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, "P. Benie" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/ References: <87hdsih7d9.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: I'm in direct contact with many advanced fun CONCEPTS. Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:55:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87hdsih7d9.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> (Michael Poole's message of "Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:00:02 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Poole writes: > Could you please elaborate the rules of English in which "An integer > constant expresion with the value 0 [...] is called a null pointer > constant" does not mean that 0 is a null pointer? Null pointer != null pointer constant. The latter is rather a syntactical construct without a real value. The process of converting a null pointer constant to a null pointer is the point where the decision is made about the final value and type. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."