From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjROz-0006j9-A9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:13:21 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjRHm-0004Q1-7H for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:05:54 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:05:54 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:05:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:05:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1325894128-26110-1-git-send-email-andrea.adami@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <1325894128-26110-1-git-send-email-andrea.adami@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Subject: Re: [meta-oe] [PATCH] xserver-common: remove extraneous BSP customizations X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:13:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 07-01-12 00:55, Andrea Adami schreef: > * delete patches meant for BSP layers * bump PR With a recipe like xserver-common I don't see a point in going all out BSP on it. This patch just moves things to layers just for the sake of moving it to layers. I strongly suspect that applying this patch will be a net burden on device maintainers instead of a gain. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk8H/NIACgkQMkyGM64RGpEvwACfRRHrwdZqrc3UrqSNvEOPvh8w kIoAn2Wpy6va4V/Y369vSwDj7AcZLuNO =oYt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----