From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HlSog-0001SA-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:45:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HlSoe-0001Rx-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:45:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlSoe-0001Ru-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:45:32 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HlShX-0000YV-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:38:11 -0400 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0657122BB for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 18:38:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Triple-fault causes abort(), which doesn't end pointer grabs References: Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 18:38:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Bronson's message of "Mon\, 7 May 2007 19\:51\:48 +0000 \(UTC\)") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Samuel Bronson writes: > So, if the guest system has a triple-fault, and I had had my mouse grab= bed, it > stays grabbed, so that X has to be restarted (as far as I know). Not if you have XF86_Ungrab bound to a key. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."