From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru3gF-0002Dk-FY for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:07:03 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru3YX-0008Kh-Gs for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:59:05 +0100 Received: from 80.187.200.205 ([80.187.200.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:59:05 +0100 Received: from koen by 80.187.200.205 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:59:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:58:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1592899.mTy93uB97i@helios> <1673681.7VAs90S7L9@helios> <054AF572-114E-4927-AC07-C595FAF205FC@dominion.thruhere.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.187.200.205 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:07:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 01-02-12 12:11, Otavio Salvador schreef: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 08:33, Koen Kooi > wrote: > >> I'm waiting for FOSDEM and ELC to discuss this face to face. > > > I won't be on those events but I'd like to participate of the discussion > so please use the mailing list. Philip, Paul and I managed to squeeze in some time today to discuss all this and the consensus matches Pauls proposal. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk8umS8ACgkQMkyGM64RGpHfZQCfZ4r468JFyOgjYeO4lcvp+I9A fpUAn3IK0r+IDujudIJmaNxqiaNxZ0ry =d+TI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----