From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/uclamp: Fix initialization of strut uclamp_rq
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 01:09:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj7dvwrood.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624172605.26715-2-qais.yousef@arm.com>
On 24/06/20 18:26, Qais Yousef wrote:
> struct uclamp_rq was zeroed out entirely in assumption that in the first
> call to uclamp_rq_inc() they'd be initialized correctly in accordance to
> default settings.
>
> But when next patch introduces a static key to skip
> uclamp_rq_{inc,dec}() until userspace opts in to use uclamp, schedutil
> will fail to perform any frequency changes because the
> rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value is zeroed at init and stays as such. Which
> means all rqs are capped to 0 by default.
>
> Fix it by making sure we do proper initialization at init without
> relying on uclamp_rq_inc() doing it later.
>
> Fixes: 69842cba9ace ("sched/uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting")
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> CC: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>
> Cc: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-24 17:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Optionally skip uclamp logic in fast path Qais Yousef
2020-06-24 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/uclamp: Fix initialization of strut uclamp_rq Qais Yousef
2020-06-25 0:09 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-06-24 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key Qais Yousef
2020-06-25 0:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-25 11:00 ` Qais Yousef
2020-06-25 11:26 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-06-25 11:34 ` Qais Yousef
2020-06-25 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Optionally skip uclamp logic in fast path Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jhj7dvwrood.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.