All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:18:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj8serixd4.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806140750.GC2077896@gmail.com>


On 06/08/20 15:07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> +#ifndef SD_FLAG
>> +#define SD_FLAG(x, y, z)
>> +#endif
>
> AFAICS there's not a single use of sd_flags.h that doesn't come with
> its own SD_FLAG definition, so I suppose this should be:
>
> #ifndef SD_FLAG
> # error "Should not happen."
> #endif
>
> ?
>

I can give this a try; for the context, I copied uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
without thinking too much, and that does:

  #ifndef __SYSCALL
  #define __SYSCALL(x, y)
  #endif

> Also, some nits:
>
>> +/*
>> + * Expected flag uses
>> + *
>> + * SHARED_CHILD: These flags are meant to be set from the base domain upwards.
>> + * If a domain has this flag set, all of its children should have it set. This
>> + * is usually because the flag describes some shared resource (all CPUs in that
>> + * domain share the same foobar), or because they are tied to a scheduling
>> + * behaviour that we want to disable at some point in the hierarchy for
>> + * scalability reasons.
>
> s/foobar/resource
>
> ?
>

That's better indeed, I think that's a remnant of when I was listing a lot
of things that could be shared.

>> +/*
>> + * cross-node balancing
>> + *
>> + * SHARED_PARENT: Set for all NUMA levels above NODE.
>> + */
>> +SD_FLAG(SD_NUMA,                12, SDF_SHARED_PARENT)
>
> s/cross-node/Cross-node
>
> BTW., is there any particular reason why these need to be defines with
> a manual enumeration of flag values - couldn't we generate
> auto-enumerated C enums instead or so?
>

I remember exploring a few different options there, but it's been a while
already. I think one of the reasons I kept some form of explicit assignment
is to avoid making reading

  /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpu*/domain*/flags

more convoluted than it is now (i.e. you have to go fetch the
bit -> name translation in the source code).

In the grand scheme of things I'd actually like to have this file output
the names of the flags rather than their values (since I now save them when
SCHED_DEBUG=y), but I didn't find a simple way to hack the existing SD ctl
table (sd_alloc_ctl_domain_table() and co) into doing this.


Now as to making this fully automagic, I *think* I could do something like
having a first enum to set up an ordering:

  #define SD_FLAG(name, ...) __##name,
  enum {
    #include <linux/sched/sd_flags.h>
  };

A second one to have powers of 2:

  #define SD_FLAG(name, ...) name = 1 << __##name,
  enum {
    #include <linux/sched/sd_flags.h>
  };

And finally the metadata array assignment might be doable with:

  #define SD_FLAG(_name, mflags) [__##_name] = { .meta_flags = mflags, .name = #_name },

Or, if there is a way somehow to directly get powers of 2 out of an enum:

  #define SD_FLAG(_name, mflags) [_ffs(_name)] = { .meta_flags = mflags, .name = #_name },

>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
>> +#define SD_FLAG(_name, idx, mflags) [idx] = {.meta_flags = mflags, .name = #_name},
>
> s/{./{ .
> s/e}/e }
>
> Thanks,
>
>       Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-31 11:54 [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-06 16:19     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 16:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] sched/topology: Split out SD_* flags declaration to its own file Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata Valentin Schneider
2020-08-04 11:08   ` peterz
2020-08-04 11:12     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-06 16:18     ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-08-08  0:19       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] sched/topology: Verify SD_* flags setup when sched_debug is on Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] sched/topology: Add more flags to the SD degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 13:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] sched/topology: Remove SD_SERIALIZE degeneration special case Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] sched/topology: Introduce SD metaflag for flags needing > 1 groups Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] sched/topology: Use prebuilt SD flag degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jhj8serixd4.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.