From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAegE-0005Ya-Ub for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:51:38 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAeXd-0007Ce-QU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:45 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:45 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1332339451-26902-1-git-send-email-s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> <20120322092859.GE4010@jama.jama.net> <20120322104009.6a4ed04e@eb-e6520> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: <20120322104009.6a4ed04e@eb-e6520> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [meta-oe] giflib: Move to OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:51:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 22-03-12 10:40, Eric Bénard schreef: > Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel > a écrit : >> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa : >>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README? >> >> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like that >> there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use case >> which excludes the meta-oe layer. >> >> > can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt. > > One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to > the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain > changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with > meta-linaro). In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches to move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the meta-openembedded repo. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJPavQHAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6IGQP+LLOR/8GoZ3Fplqwacx5g0Nf 9CTeHg1Pz+owg6yJ8H0UiQmfks3R5P6mq19vkvxEjXqYMBmv+Apk5O+qwWxLgfgQ 2Bn7v5zywQ9fiIa8NEqDtECFFnYUcgxlOFT6AUTDoN/ZqKXjJkbM8jADkjNGCBWD 0tHSk2V+eELujPAhkboxV+977aUS4vyETUahIr0rWGdUKJbNEse5yN2r6UFxNL8f 7cffRnurY9qhD9Ebm7QZ1AI8shoRoG3Z4SRnFH4Hf5xO7rr7g8M13ItLF6u6GnZk TZUlGRcMUmAgx1CW16LLfWKPh4s+XACoq1QPJe5LvN0UPlE0q2QOi6254PbkaJSs 2mk7FgaZUN0btBo5XmKfa7YMyh3VMIVhyvj2VPK+HY4Yn9lUcJLlqi98LyZ3kYpA KwjVJG66XoV5NCUOOIEBriTC+d+keHwdhAPYp6vQMLIu5B4vJQCb/9Vpf7yrkydE wHYTyUFiXF9BSfRn2k85dYOCtg9e25u0ev4O8JNFiLWM5xfTi1T9WbS4h+duC28D ukklNHsyJXOL8eT0OzGO8Z88ldRyOpLrcnXmgBw8KVQmWNZAX/TT2+pa2t2FOwvQ dFB1ay3+AxEHkrYyaeXj5bNQ9ugYchb7UWGh9/2EzUsSMWhYcJi6uWvxex0A/rp0 MnufdpP7bO3CyXxl4Gk= =Rz9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----