From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAfOK-0000WB-5S for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:37:12 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAfFg-0008SY-TE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:28:16 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:28:16 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:28:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:27:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1332410499-18183-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120322100758.GG4010@jama.jama.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:37:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 22-03-12 11:15, Koen Kooi schreef: > > Op 22 mrt. 2012, om 11:07 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi >> >> Why not move them? > > This was done to have people test it in the oe-core + meta-toolchain > setup. And to avoid bblayers.conf conflicts > >> Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to >> bblayers and then move it in 2nd. > > That sounds like a better way to do it. Maybe Eric will do that in his > patchset :) I don't have a strong opinion on this and if Eric wants me to respin the RFC I'll gladly do that. But I would prefer that I can be lazy and just merge other peoples patches :) regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPav6tAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6zcYP/2CHId7lbxYDDC2sMa8fb7Nt +FIRDOIDyF+laMlAwuMMuN0NN6228mxnxmCD0tkrcq6wJnaBJ5+LKkHmwYAUnjrY q4ayrZTWGGTIkcYVpeizZCh15AomFLuBzTKP/XdOUESQscheV/zdWgT26hqVRQrS 3spk1oS2kzevvmmSqjxBxUUmFMGi85ZcjcsN0aIUpf11+dkU1SpIrGIr7BnybGr/ FEXzWFCHRtSsmI9J6n6dhrDrm3d2fMxV+9AbqeE1SQbaGV+lA+vag5aDhYdfpbOF S+aPYCCm0rrDsFvNqYTq/IU5Fx2/WUa6zHZlnWoUd1iyvPOaiRezGS7diQfV0R3v OxCy/75j2cq2ofPebJWG5zGhDvDk9TWW6BqC791WAm9VJjD4ztFhvtE12nXYqIoC 9TDAoURNPNX4FBnLQkX0p6Luo4P5c9hgo6BBwQZR2fwmov4R1nq91AFsMrKJRyxh VCAqSbzaTJq1zJhh5UZNwRB0SyvDgLbi58NFVOGItX/DUUCUbjC+/aXyIV4Czf75 OeQ29f8vPvzed9wryg8rdogccbuJ2QY9MGaBfEkUOwBNt/HzhYFY4WpcGvvpqsqA VzPe0wst0+ncGdB2/MewNETXPGy3Mp8xvUTvlabaXnOzRmZqUxkqONVnSZkQqGOy BCepRNuESem5ktLHCKQS =5mMh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----