From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAgKH-00067R-8v for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:37:06 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAgBg-0004kL-7F for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:28:12 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:28:12 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:28:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1332339451-26902-1-git-send-email-s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> <20120322092859.GE4010@jama.jama.net> <20120322104009.6a4ed04e@eb-e6520> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [meta-oe] giflib: Move to OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:37:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 22-03-12 11:12, Samuel Stirtzel schreef: > 2012/3/22 Eric Bénard : >> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel >> a écrit : >>> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa : >>>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README? >>> >>> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like >>> that there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use >>> case which excludes the meta-oe layer. >>> >>> >> can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt. > > Since I have the common use case of the installation provided from the > setup-scripts and I don't know the exact use case, I cannot provide this > information myself right now. So you can't explain why it should move to oe-core, that should be enough to NAK this patch without even looking at it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPawy/AAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6cdAP/3CIpSE6k6BOPHXEri6hgLU4 kfQhs6GKHRxgyCB63jDWJ1EShrErKUrCksWMAXO6p7tBniuMk8X5mJmQ4mBfHH9b 0yTu5bPFxB/zsK0lFqoOfWMOuwaJLZJQCuEQLJP4VvlVxexb5sZMbzMvudh+pGwQ DZEgDGbTF+hUrcxu0Rjxug9UXJa4nqfiCJ7ShKy3U2+ichZnr4tU9YfUl5ZGoofT W/xtJOBwEKogGB0KxIb2tphtChpoA8rPMy5WvRqlJ39lDsUOdOHUl5/Vu83Czpee ynFe5aRxYjsz0NUovuiBc5SUwVCwqJApR164FCFIkhHg7l1G7OJelSrn1+oqA62f fX6MTno5dYpaWImx2KiGqHOKqJF4wo+C0QqGNFBYde4Yu9Xu2Wdx/GQnycov6TOf deQtQnDHFZ4K4oaT4ptQvzcb0qN4KU5f3scCjSAR9SMNfPjjuaI7wmlRD8UwGB61 s1oipV+SNE9icv8qSGbV9gw1Bo+B9w4AHRZllt9tdsDhnoMldBot7Fhc+FuW0MbH uFOmzi4R1j9lXmoh5pcFkmZKSYra4/UhU9DkwGZ4IZzEMCE4cxfwDc3MYGyPPOTE 0oMbq01pmAfPsio7gQ1bE73WC0JWBhKfbFJ7KxF3mH0oC1+mrBw9y2Al+7Zd0o7P B+y8ooG5B0ELZdWvczXO =EYSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----