From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAhKE-0007t4-0p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:06 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAhBa-0003U1-4J for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:10 +0100 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:10 +0100 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1332410499-18183-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120322100758.GG4010@jama.jama.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:41:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 22-03-12 13:23, Khem Raj schreef: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Koen Kooi > wrote: Op 22-03-12 11:15, Koen Kooi schreef: >>>> >>>> Op 22 mrt. 2012, om 11:07 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende >>>> geschreven: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi >>>>> >>>>> Why not move them? >>>> >>>> This was done to have people test it in the oe-core + >>>> meta-toolchain setup. And to avoid bblayers.conf conflicts >>>> >>>>> Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add >>>>> it to bblayers and then move it in 2nd. >>>> >>>> That sounds like a better way to do it. Maybe Eric will do that in >>>> his patchset :) > > I don't have a strong opinion on this and if Eric wants me to respin the > RFC I'll gladly do that. But I would prefer that I can be lazy and just > merge other peoples patches :) > >> yes git move should be better since then we can do git log --follow I >> dont know if that works with copied files too or not. > >> meta-toolchain may not be the best name since we already have >> meta-toolchain as a target for sdk generation. that should actually >> have been called sdk but here we will create a confusion. but may be >> target in OE-Core should ve renamed too I'm fine with calling it 'toolchain-layer' and not using the 'meta' prefix. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPaxu+AAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6GL8P/3ctciJfWKTgKaOLlSdtTvCD M1f6p06mm81ZRy2jvrxiB0Ui/TVI7QBRnRZ7Cq+FaCe9vOFXLmINL1ljIYSB3Fkz CxZBc+wj6BDuPGk6SHN13lhYJgZmKcTY/mfYT2sp4R+VEC/Zv4M8o2SB7qUuLxuY wWtP8O1/ydJTvdk/IcPMDSoRtNRM+pHBd/grt20N2l7c8/80SYM2xFQAG/ACDNmt oHFFzNfg46c9YaB9aAey02OLaC/sh0r9NrZ6vQcRZp1bDf0RlIprTpBBDANfp2ss hEQhZTZmYN44JtmrJBK7fnpxxjNvRK1E24+rWFQSR+0rFzFNBsOtOGypegxN5VAs ypcOjUBvNF4TivxZUAcxLOTEN4YgW93pbp/lDVhGgiGIAPYMclHPP8By8dhI6ErE JLbWrQGAV87wux+KKAkYzXzO25NeMGo0TZc35wnTsT+P+/q4aqZyK9eV9b+p73lF O1GqN5MyGHWOGM8Xbfjx6ycaeArrUxBqdk5omcxlmM/ieeDwAQWrGKWNxChmXbN9 Mu7dMqSLCnCV4d8xSX8HCZuIhhdqDGVmL5MSTAW5930+6Sdaa8OfdRd6m9Y26Mpf SYAparX2d6YBdvTCDrO8O1Bukx+6LXXN5PThP975euhdL5pasOwjl3M77J87LGJh oznZSDS/uXbq9lRFSx6+ =nkR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----