From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1oMCWR-00081N-Rs for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:03:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oMCWO-0007yt-TH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:03:06 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:46966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oMCWK-0008L6-IP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:03:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1660240979; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iCWCszpm2Eh0kZOq3003XEsi+A311WAf1jHUMDozW64=; b=ElOuKmj6j9m4RymkcWcyf/T8ooxiNvOw5lNmNTltU+XYsWyMifgl5PWeBPsdUxwQNxi8pb OEiaPNWjBHUGXxXwswyi9wp18WCwzezPbrBs/XQ5JXYiaVC2F0mfYZznGinTHiqCE6jDjZ FMNIRYQtkI/uHh3oIdBF6pWzE7ciN2A= Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-222-ZyNn68ryOYmwQm9k-HXCeA-1; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:02:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZyNn68ryOYmwQm9k-HXCeA-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id dn2-20020a056214094200b0047491ead6a2so9737136qvb.2 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:02:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=iCWCszpm2Eh0kZOq3003XEsi+A311WAf1jHUMDozW64=; b=CTfVt1VwDTlxAkIaBcRhWjHnaE9fmn5X4dJ56mhdeMMaTqVYGYQCVa3pWTHes1npFa GWdDSuprd2s7bOX3Uc2y9UkvKbafj4dqopyd950jMQfx2PtpsyTDo4mi13JkD0tBUob1 dpNtVVPNibLnaJj4nTdo5qN1iN08M8QJotl7Rm3mpJ9RabWM6rAeUV92WNTCGpODrajq y5klVW/3I1VgkazDyftrTFDoZUV/tduru5vgHxLZMJHVfuUGrzYTUv3kAyMdsdhQpXaw a0uzNfJ6KvDuRCixJSryLxQdI9FEySx0Pd/CdbjRnLtwfuPRwEqwu78VVepcG6nohNer GvTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3CJkJabXbs7cwg7Gmvj5GHRDKFOwv7snWzWmc0Vyz/5B9lFxpt 9OI7XAS6vnr0M3lkz/sFu1zn+AUmwAkD0Yiy10lX1H7KbqEeyV4WVRfqyBk0mThSx5uYephC9e8 xKlWsRlrlQyA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2894:b0:6b6:53c1:5ad4 with SMTP id j20-20020a05620a289400b006b653c15ad4mr163097qkp.94.1660240977006; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:02:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6jeUDY2qW+VULxK2G9ozYdb5gbN3XtBRoaSu2wvNq5uO2/hnfqOZlBbiTVCEhGwHstQk9cWw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2894:b0:6b6:53c1:5ad4 with SMTP id j20-20020a05620a289400b006b653c15ad4mr163071qkp.94.1660240976642; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2601:184:4181:74c0:862e:5809:ed9e:e10e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v11-20020a05620a0f0b00b006b5f0e8d1b9sm2457426qkl.81.2022.08.11.11.02.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Robbie Harwood To: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko , The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Add support for grub-emu to kexec Linux menu entries In-Reply-To: References: <20220719203934.319797-1-rharwood@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:02:53 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=rharwood@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:03:06 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" writes: > I like it in general however I had a comment: in future GRUB could be able > to do the same through second approach: load a constructed kexec blob with > all the parts. This would allow to e.g. kexec FreeBSD. This didn't have to > be implemented now. Meanwhile can we use "kexec" as command name? It's fine > to have aliases "linux" and co, just let's have a command line that won't > be broken if second approach becomes a reality I don't think I follow. In this hypothetical future, couldn't we just rename this code to something else and avoid the problem entirely? But maybe I'm misunderstanding. In any case, I don't see support for aliases anywhere, so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Be well, --Robbie --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJIBAEBCgAyFiEEA5qc6hnelQjDaHWqJTL5F2qVpEIFAmL1RE0UHHJoYXJ3b29k QHJlZGhhdC5jb20ACgkQJTL5F2qVpELrGw/8CKlx02wbyQ2Yw1yXbcQ3WfQT2zEf 6HQ0iqkkc/Gt/kq7KhNFOLfeGAwK1JdIAXzR/90I5wYfj44pAGTn+X42woeQDNuJ 1r8Jspxfg40WzlRad31Y8hLusoTHoUNUQAhK+Ao+Txko6sBmUcq1z0K5ybfT6dLR LUeP/46GpJO//8VzFLvnbBSaiS/bllI90sOW0KpbYuAC+jtni8o//NwkizBXUlUH o68R2mOx3U8w7qPMh3SRbvQcGQaPf3FmJvkXJdYJzPXi5ASX2haNOcolUxNMJqp6 FF1SzNaYxJ4h8ScsKD6OoS+IcdMNkl0ef5O4596gLbHEl8A64eEtXmuheXiWLwsn LLbRW1s3kSlADXDCnat07/W2270FflDvomBvywrmFtM7WD1xfjNBpsDe58cME0Hx tK3ihq+FfhviL/X5Q79PcCKxc+tcBxSB4rFXafEHePvqNdlqzGZI+wNrP5DbpIL0 iPaupcdEFKfyhZlLnYVcYLv/1bCITSE1HuPXQsDNmsqjNBixUp1IDMdBKHMbJHBv 1wGNUl1O2OEb8riVvBSN0+JR7W3jwMyd4I2SMp7L/XM7tmHGcJUSXrxAw8Xyzmw0 H/Vlbkwdlr4C1FNpkQSGWqBOLJAwip8tTlCaJOyCjI8Z7LtffZcygzCWely6R5QX 7FQBrbI9niXzQKc= =4m// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--