From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SUECp-0004LF-KH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:38:11 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUE3A-0005JS-Jb for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:28:12 +0200 Received: from ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl ([84.80.112.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:28:12 +0200 Received: from koen by ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 11:28:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:27:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Subject: Re: New kmod {libdir} breaks udev, systemd build X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:38:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 14-05-12 19:42, Marko Lindqvist schreef: > On 14 May 2012 20:23, Thilo Fromm wrote: >> >> openembedded-core only features udev-164 (vs. -182 in meta-oe). -164 in >> oe-core does not use libkmod, so there's no issue with libkmod in >> oe-core. It's no surprise that it "worked for you", you were building >> anicent tools. > > I know. I were asking why versions are setup like this. If -182 makes > more sensible default, why it's not one in -core. My main point was that > seemingly unrelated change to build xterm to my image (requiring meta-oe > layer) caused *default* udev version to change (I'm not setting > PREFERRED_VERSION anywhere). Setting preferred versions is the task of the DISTRO. If the DISTRO doesn't care about the udev version, it will change if you add different versions to your stack. If that offends you, switch to another DISTRO. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPsiGdAAoJEHZqAkdh1vT6qUIP/2l+gdBLEmcr1eNJAXa2brKf 7EpMMNChKurwoBQHJqWUFYWGfFDpTsda02jIV3sB4dZ7DzVCrs4MQrBQYBNvoYhb /xrjnObNDv12mlVTmBU8mfL9BtkCGdjhEs9lq1WDGO6nTEVnlE3T8+skmoGuDfwV vq1HejuwMNsM5SaC8/jEHDM41YT5gqDMOViSZhwIfSvCPzJ2dc4An5yq601HEIH4 T+SM+BpGLmUgsW0mMnTXgo61BCHc3DMtV3qVl8V/FJRm92OigWUFWihSE+lv9G6O URpErYOwYFaQaqZs3Ma3MpBQ3GGj1q2FC0ypJ9PsdU2W4SPZsMxJD7VDg/1HbLzn tsVQPB2+DILoIjUliq+YAAVERj0rAaGbHw6dvFKuaielYjBkCutj3UICG8i0tTyJ rtIvK7NbWm9BON3t4EHpuzsmyQ90q24glbKGYsEF1F2ckaXj4TRntDcJPu9Cha/7 OQ3lunZINzRf2xKE/ixzmMvTlhehvhrusuV3QboRg0UBVAFlscjeTuZCf+VpX4SY GKPEV9GZH/0aZwwQgx3/E/+tcwac+IKc+RGk6b3jU269Dz/ShcHmXsBWlCpw2St7 fNakj0PELguutLMqeEYTJedqUBFpfd6y7oz1upxyMF21EUkBdK9mvEF1OX9XmXhs tQR8lTJjm8PJZ8doKJjk =bXQJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----