From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Dirk Müller" <dmueller@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:02:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgy4ffho3v.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006102329.GC20886@8bytes.org> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:29 +0200")
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:42:43PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 12:54:43PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
>> >> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> writes:
>> >> The problems is that the next_rip field could be stale. If the processor supports
>> >> next_rip, then it will clear it out on the next entry. If it doesn't,
>> >> an old value just sits there (no matter who wrote it) and the problem
>> >> happens when skip_emulated_instruction advances the rip with an incorrect
>> >> value.
>> >
>> > So the right fix would be to just set the guests next_rip to 0 when we
>> > emulate vmrun, just like real hardware does, no?
>>
>> Agreed, resetting to 0 if nrips isn't supported seems right. It would still
>> help having a printk_once in this case IMO :)
>
> I meant to reset it always to 0 on vmrun, like real hardware does.
Atleast the spec don't mention this, I don't know how I got that idea :) The spec
just say that it gets written to by hardware on certain intercepts and for others
it gets reset to 0 on #VMEXIT.
>
>
> Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-06 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 11:43 [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS Dirk Müller
2015-10-01 12:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-01 12:45 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-01 12:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-01 22:31 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-02 6:43 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-05 1:15 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-05 9:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-05 16:54 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-05 17:15 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-05 17:42 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-06 10:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-06 18:02 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-10-05 20:12 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-05 22:00 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-06 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-06 17:59 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 11:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:47 ` [PATCH] kvm: svm: Only propagate next_rip when guest supports it Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:57 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 17:03 ` Dirk Müller
2015-10-07 14:58 ` [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS Bandan Das
2015-10-07 15:24 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgy4ffho3v.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=dmueller@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.