From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1E2F-0006BJ-NL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:07:39 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Dqj-0006Oz-Bj for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:55:45 +0200 Received: from ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl ([77.162.165.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:55:45 +0200 Received: from koen by ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:55:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:55:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Subject: Re: [meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer] Adding retired toolchain support for gcc-4.5.1 and eglibc-2.13 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:07:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 13-08-12 22:28, Elvis Dowson schreef: > Hi, I've created a set of patches to add retired toolchain support for > gcc-4.5.1, to the meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer. Given that 4.5.x was deleted from meta-toolchain 3 months ago[1], what's the rationale for adding it back? It's still available in the denzil branch, so unless someone steps up to maintain it I'm inclined to say "no" to patches bringing it back in the master branch. regards, Koen [1] https://github.com/openembedded/meta-oe/commit/6291c6fd1243d722e144466921064d47fb50428b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFQKiCVMkyGM64RGpERAnipAJ9Qh6Fjy39VXgPShQCDlab4kMvVDACgvFTu es5P6TemPajpqazhoMN5zTs= =l3Oy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----