From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rutger ter Borg Subject: Re: Multiple concurrent async ops per IoCtx? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:16:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <503E2A18.5000603@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36451 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750897Ab2H3MRF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:17:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T73gH-00015T-N4 for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:17:05 +0200 Received: from 82-169-160-32.ip.telfort.nl ([82.169.160.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:17:05 +0200 Received: from rutger by 82-169-160-32.ip.telfort.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:17:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <503E2A18.5000603@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 2012-08-29 16:41, Josh Durgin wrote: > Yes, all the asynchronous functions can run in parallel. An IoCtx > has little bearing on performance - it mostly just saves you from > specifying the full set of parameters (i.e. pool, snapshot id, snapshot > context, etc.) for each operation. > > Are you seeing behavior that looks like the aio operations aren't being > run in parallel? > > Josh Thanks, that's all I wanted to check at this point! Cheers, Rutger